The Infrapolitics of Repression Edited by:Thomas Chevallier, Université Catholique de Louvain; Pascale Dufour, Université de Montréal; Joëlle Dussault, City University of New York; Julien Talpin, CNRS Where does political repression begin? Studies of repression and the control of political activity tend to focus on the most visible forms of protest, and the most obvious actors. The most frequently used definition of repression in sociology and political science presents repression as a set of “efforts to suppress either contentious acts or groups and organizations responsible for them” (McAdam, Tarrow and Tilly, 2001: 69). This understanding of repression focuses on direct action by the state to limit protest events by force and use of coercive means. Following the work of McAdam, Tarrow and Tilly, a significant proportion of current definitions of repression relate the phenomenon to a will from the state to silence, control or prevent political contestation on the part of actors outside the state and the institutionalized political system (Dufour and Dussault, 2022; Dupuis-Déri, 2013; Earl, 2011; Earl and Soule, 2010; Koopmans and Statham, 1999; Mitchell and Staeheli, 2005; Wood, 2007, 2015). While this work is essential, this special issue aims to broaden the spectrum of analysis of repressive practices by looking at the whole range of institutional practices aimed at controlling, framing, or limiting protest and criticism. In recent years, research has been conducted focusing on less visible forms of repression, based in particular on practices of stigmatization or material hindrance (Garcia, 2014; Jämte and Ellefsen, 2020; Marx Ferree, 2004; Talpin, 2016; Maestri and Montforte, 2021). Different sets of practices can be mentioned: the way the funding of organizations can channel criticism and political action; the delegitimation or stigmatization of activist groups or causes; the marginalization of certain actors by public devices aimed at “partnership”; the constraints on the material and physical resources necessary for organizing; the division of activists’ groups or the organization of competition between them, etc. Still little documented empirically, these discrete forms of control nevertheless strongly impact people's ability to criticize constituted powers. This issue contributes to refining the analysis of repressive practices by highlighting another facet: the infrapolitics of repression. In the words of James C. Scott, infrapolitics is the interstice within which the "hidden text" of the subaltern lies. Infrapolitics takes shape, expresses itself, constructs itself and articulates itself strategically with the "public text" of domination, i.e., with the score played by the community as a whole, through institutions (Scott, 1990). Typically used to speak to the resistance of subaltern groups in the face of domination, we have taken up the concept of infrapolitics to think about the forms of control and repression that are not visible, but which structure both the repertoires of action of the dominant and the spaces of contestation of the subalterns. This special issue therefore focuses on the discrete, informal, hidden, and indirect forms of control exercised by various actors to limit the political power of subaltern groups. Particular attention will be paid to articles that focus on less commonly studied areas of social movements. We invite papers addressing one or more of the following axes:
Proposals can use different types of methods (qualitative and quantitative) and research designs (case studies, comparisons). We strongly encourage proposals covering different parts of the world and types of sociopolitical contexts, also beyond the North American and European one. Instructions for applicants: We only accept proposals in English. Abstracts of 250 words are expected by December 1st, 2024, to be submitted to the following email address: [email protected] Relevant deadlines
References Almeida, P. D. 2008. Waves of Protest: Popular Struggle in El Salvador, 1925–2005. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press. Bellot, C., Dupuis-Déri, F., Dussault, J., Lemonde, L. et A. D. Morin. 2016. Étouffer la dissidence. Vingt-cinq ans de répression politique au Québec. Montréal : LUX. Bonelli, L., H., Rayner, B. Voutat. Contestations et (re)légitimations du renseignement en démocratie. Introduction. Cultures & Conflits, 114-115(2-3), 2019, p. 7-28. Chevallier, T. 2022. Financements publics et limitation de l’autonomie des associations dans les quartiers populaires. Une démarche exploratoire par ethnographie budgétaire auprès de deux associations à Lille. Sociologie, 13(4), 439‑459. Chevallier, T. 2021. « La démobilisation par le partenariat. L’exemple d’une association de quartier à Lille ». Dans Démobiliser les quartiers populaires. Sous la direction Talpin, J., Vulbeau, J. et A. Delfini. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. Codaccioni, V. 2013. Expériences répressives et (dé)radicalisation militante. Cultures & Conflits, (89), 29‑52. https://doi.org/10.4000/conflits.18629 Codaccioni, V. 2019. (Se) faire justice. Délibération, 6(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3917/delib.006.0048 Combes, H. 2020. « Répression ». Dans Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux. Sous la direction de Fillieule, O., Mathieu, L. et C. Péchu, (pp. 502-508). Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques. Cunningham, D. 2004. There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence. Berkeley : University of California Press. Dominique-Legault, P. 2022. « La pérennisation de la surveillance des marginaux et anarchistes aux étudiants ». Dans Profilages policiers. Sous la direction de Dufour, P. et F. Dupuis-Déri (pp. 143-164). Montréal : Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal. Dufour, P. et J. Dussault. 2022. « Répression ». Dans Dictionnaire critique et interdisciplinaire de la Participation, DicoPart (2ème édition). Sous la direction de Petit, G., Blondiaux, L., Casillo, I., Fourniau, J.-M., Gourgues, G., Hayat, S., Lefebvre, R., Rui, S., Wojcik, S. et J. Zetlaoui-Léger. GIS Démocratie et Participation. https://www.dicopart.fr/repression-2022. Dufour, P. et F. Dupuis-Déri (dir.). 2022. Profilages policiers. Montréal : Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal. Dupuis-Déri, F. (dir.). 2013. À qui la rue? : Répression policière et mouvements sociaux. Montréal : Les Éditions Écosociété. Earl, J. 2011. Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 261-284. Earl, J. et S. A. Soule. 2010. « The Impacts of Repression: The Effect of Police Presence and Action on Subsequent Protest Rates. » Dans Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (Vol. 30). Sous la direction de Coy, P. G. (pp. 75-113). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. Eliasoph, N., 1998. Avoiding politics. How Americans produce Apathy in Everyday Life, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Garcia, O. J. M. 2014. Soft Repression and the Current Wave of Social Mobilisations in Spain. Social Movement Studies, 13(2), 303-308. Hennette-Vauchez, S. 2022. Lutte contre les séparatismes et liberté d'association. Etudes, 9, 57-68. INCITE! (dir.). 2017 [2004]. The revolution will not be funded: beyond the non-profit industrial complex. Durham : Duke University Press. Jämte J. et R. Ellefsen. 2020. The Consequences of Soft Repression. Mobilization: an International Quaterly, 25(3), 383-404. Koopmans, R. et P. Statham. 1999. Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches. Mobilization: an International Quaterly, 4(2), 203-221. Ligue des droits et libertés. 2015. Déclaration commune contre C-51. Montréal : Ligue des droits et libertés. Maestri, G. et P. Monforte. 2021. « Keeping it private or making it political? “Soft repression” and the depoliticisation of everyday conversations among pro-refugee volunteers. » Dans Contentious Migrant Solidarity. Sous la direction de della Porta, D. et E. Steinhilper (pp. 85-101). London : Routledge. Marx Ferree, M. 2004. « Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma and Silencing in Gender-based Movements. » Dans Repression and Mobilization. Sous la direction de Davenport, C., Johnston, H. et C. Mueller (pp. 138-155). University of Minnesota Press. McAdam D. 1990. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. G. et T. Charles. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press. Mitchell, D., et L. A. Staeheli. 2005. Permitting Protest: Parsing the Fine Geography of Dissent in America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 796-813. O’Brien, K. J. et Y. Deng. 2015. Repression backfires: Tactical radicalization and protest spectacle in rural China. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(93), 457-470. Scott, J., [1990] 2019, La domination et les arts de la résistance. Fragments du discours subalterne, Paris, Editions Amsterdam. Steinhoff, P. G. et G. Zwerman. 2013. Passer puis renoncer à l’action violente: Les mouvements de la nouvelle gauche aux États-Unis et au Japon face à la répression. Cultures & conflits, (89), 71‑92. https://doi.org/10.4000/conflits.18649 Talpin, J. 2016. Une répression à bas bruit. Comment les élus étouffent les mobilisations populaires. Métropolitiques. https://metropolitiques.eu/Une-repression-a-bas-bruit-Comment-les-elus-etouffent-les-mobilisations-dans.html Talpin, J. et P. Bonnevalle. 2023. Financements associatifs et pouvoir local. Enquête sur les subventions aux associations dans une ville du Nord. Gouvernement et action publique, 12(2), p. 37-64. Vedaschi, A. et C. Graziani. 2019. National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: Past, present and future. DPCE Online, 39(1), 749-773. Wood, L. J. 2015. Mater la meute : la militarisation de la gestion policière des manifestations. (Dupont, E. Trad.) Montréal : LUX. Wood. L. J. 2007. Breaking the wave: Repression, identity, and Seattle tactics. Mobilization, 12(4), 377-388. |
e-ISSN: 2035-6609